![]() (d) In a prosecution for murder or manslaughter, if a defendant raises as a defense a justification provided by subsection (a) of this Code section, the defendant, in order to establish the defendant's reasonable belief that the use of force or deadly force was immediately necessary, may be permitted to offer: (c) Any rule, regulation, or policy of any agency of the state or any ordinance, resolution, rule, regulation, or policy of any county, municipality, or other political subdivision of the state which is in conflict with this Code section shall be null, void, and of no force and effect. (3) Was the aggressor or was engaged in a combat by agreement unless he withdraws from the encounter and effectively communicates to such other person his intent to do so and the other, notwithstanding, continues or threatens to continue the use of unlawful force. (2) Is attempting to commit, committing, or fleeing after the commission or attempted commission of a felony or ![]() (1) Initially provokes the use of force against himself with the intent to use such force as an excuse to inflict bodily harm upon the assailant (b) A person is not justified in using force under the circumstances specified in subsection (a) of this Code section if he: ![]() (a) A person is justified in threatening or using force against another when and to the extent that he or she reasonably believes that such threat or force is necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person against such other's imminent use of unlawful force however, except as provided in Code Section 16-3-23, a person is justified in using force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm only if he or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent death or great bodily injury to himself or herself or a third person or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony. Use of force in defense of self or others evidence of belief that force was necessary in murder or manslaughter prosecution § 16-3-21 - Use of force in defense of self or others evidence of belief that force was necessary in murder or manslaughter prosecutionġ6-3-21. I'm doubting that we could develop a technology to sustain high acceleration (other than a centrifuge) for more than a few minutes, or perhaps a few hours.View our newest version here 2010 Georgia CodeĬHAPTER 3 - DEFENSES TO CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS Or, one could design an external leg pump that would regularly compress and relieve pressure on the legs to assist the heart. In fact, a pressure suit might be designed to push blood out of the legs and possibly the arms. Anyway, so an aquatic environment like for a fish might still rank as quite good.įor short acceleration (a few minutes), then one wouldn't have to worry about leg perfusion. Reclined, or even flat on one's back is probably best, with a good conforming support (like water), or possibly a custom moulded surface (with some padding). So, air and oils would move upward, and higher density compounds would move downward. Then, there could be a problem with separating everything inside of the organism by density. However, if one thinks of it as centrifuging. If one is embedded in a liquid with equal density as the organism, then it would give excellent external support for the body.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |